Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Full Council | Response to the debate on Energy Bill Revolution

Here's my response to the debate on my Notice of Motion:


It's been a fascinating debate but very little I heard from the bench opposite has been about the motion

I've been planning the table this motion before the conference season 
(see here for when I first heard about the Energy Bill Campaign)

The 150 organisations supporting this Energy Bill Revolution include 
The Scouts Association - the Cooperative Group - eon – Warrington Borough Council - Rethink Mental Illness - Keep Britain Tidy - Asda - WWF - Fire Brigade Union

201 MPs have signed the petition - MPS of all hues
I' m sorry that neither of Exeter's MPs are absent from that list

Cllr Shiel
Suggests that this has no relevance to the business of this council
I believe that 6000 families in this city facing fuel poverty IS the business of this council.

17 other councils have decided it is their business and have already signed the Energy Bill Revolution

Cllr Leadbetter
Yes, there are green taxes but figures I received earlier today say that the cost decommissioning Nuclear Power stations are also included - and they currently stand at twice that of green taxes

Cllr Ruffle
Yes, The Green Deal hasn't worked
This is a new vision of looking at using £4 billion per year to address fuel poverty here in Exeter and beyond

Cllr Donovan
Please go back to he motion
This isn't about Ed Miliband's freeze
I repeat again, each and every 1 of the Big 6 companies already have fixed tariffs now
Ineed, I signed up to one last week

I thank Cllr Henson for her calculations
And her history lesson - but I'm looking to the future

None of this is about price rises or new taxes

It's about using the carbon taxes currently collected by the
Govt and redirect them To tackle fuel poverty


Full Council Notice of Motion | Energy Bill Revolution

My speech to Full Council on my Notice of Motion on  a way forward in tackling the crisis of fuel poverty:


We are facing an energy bill crisis, with millions of people nationwide struggling to heat their homes.

It is estimated that 5,957 families in Exeter are currently in fuel poverty

What does that mean?

It means that nearly 6000 households in Exeter need to spend more than 10% of their income on keeping their homes warm.

And the problem is likely to get worse,
with 1 in 3 households projected to be in fuel poverty by 2016 compared with 1 in 5 now.

There are 2 main reasons for this crisis

Gas, oil and coal prices are high,

And the UK’s homes are some of the most energy inefficient in Europe – leaking heat from their doors, walls and windows.

This means they cost much more than they should to heat and power, and that contributes to climate change too.

Cold homes are damaging the health of vulnerable members of society, including children, older people and people with disabilities.

Diseases such as asthma are made worse, and people are more likely to have strokes and heart attacks.

Illnesses caused by cold homes cost the NHS nearly one billion pounds each year.

But there is a fair and permanent solution to this crisis

We can have warm homes, reduce our fuel bills and cut carbon emissions.

The answer is for the Government to use the money it gets from carbon taxes to help make homes super-energy efficient – with excellent insulation, renewable energy and modern boilers.

Even though these things save money on energy bills and keep our homes warmer, many people simply can’t afford to pay for them – meaning they stay cold.

That’s why the Government must provide more funding to help.

The funding is there – from carbon taxes used to help combat climate change

What about the current funding of the failing Green Deal scheme?

That Green Deal that will spark an energy efficiency and home improvement revolution

A Freedom of Information request in August this year revealed that some £20 million has been spent on administering the Green Deal

That’s in addition to some £244 million set aside in loans to pay for measures such as a new boiler, loft insulation or solar panels

Yet figures published by the Department of Energy and Climate Change show despite 38,256 assessments having been conducted, but as last week 961 of these had been signed by the customer.
All this hot air (no pun intended) and only 961 sign up?
That means probably 3 households in Exeter have signed up.
Nearly 6000 families face fuel poverty in Exeter and only 3 households sign up to a deal that will spark an energy efficiency and home improvement revolution

The figure falls farcically short of the target ministers had set of 10,000 by the end of the year.

At current rates, it could take 160 years for all of the UK's housing to benefit.
Companies who were taking on staff to cope with the demand are now laying them off.
The fact that over 95% of people who had a Green Deal assessment didn’t want to take out a package should be a wake-up call for the government
So wakey wakey – Mchael Fallon, George Osborn and David Cameron
Over the next 15 years the Government will raise an average of £4 billion every year in carbon taxes.

If the Government recycled this carbon revenue back to households, it could provide billions of pounds to help insulate the UK’s homes. The benefits would be immense.

This could bring 9 out of 10 homes out of fuel poverty, lower people’s bills, cut carbon emissions AND create jobs.

It’s time for an Energy Bill Revolution.

This money could be used to help all households or just to support the most vulnerable.

There is, for example, enough carbon tax revenue to treat 600,000 fuel poor households every year, providing each of them with a grant worth on average £6,500 to install energy efficiency measures. This would reduce their energy bills by an average £310 a year.

Recycling carbon revenue to make homes super-energy efficient could bring 9 out of 10 homes out of fuel poverty. It could also be used to quadruple savings in carbon emissions compared to the Government’s new energy efficiency schemes and create up to 200,000 jobs – exactly what we need to support the UK’s economic recovery.

I’d like Exeter City Council to join The Energy Bill Revolution  - a movement of people committed to ensuring warm homes and lower bills for all.

It is a public alliance, made up of over 150 major organisations
children’s and older people’s charities,
environmental groups,
health and disability groups,
trade unions,
consumer groups,
businesses, politicians and public figures.

The Liberal Democats agreed to back the campaign when they voted through the “Green Growth, Green Jobs” policy paper at their conference on Sunday 15th September.

A commitment to use carbon revenue to insulate fuel poor homes has  become official liberal democrat party policy.

At the Labour conference, the party announced that they would scrap the Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation and replace them with more effective policies.


But nothing on this matter at the Conservative Party Conference – and I should know.

At times during the conference, I was rated by MHP Communications as in top 10 of #Tory social media influencers/

Even the Big 6 Energy companies have signed up,

Yes those baddies who complain about Ed Miliband’s pseudo-Marxist plans to freeze energy prices after the General Election because it will put them out of business

Those self-same Big 6 Energy companies, each of who already offer at least 1 tariff that is frozen to 2015 or beyond.

Frozen prices can help them earn business now, but not in 2015.

Thatcher privatized the energy market to increase competition – now Cameron complains there isn’t enough competition.

But its not competition we need now to solve the crisis of fuel poverty

It’s co-operation

I hope you will all support this resolution


Monday, 7 October 2013

Notice of Motion | An Energy Bill Revolution - Reducing Fuel Bills through Energy Efficiency

I have asked for the following motion to be discussed at the next Full Council meeting on Tuesday 15 October, under Standing Order 6


Energy Bill Revolution - Reducing Fuel Bills through Energy EfficiencyThe Council notes:

1. Already 1 in 4 households in the UK are in fuel poverty, meaning they need to spend more than 10% of their income on keeping their homes warm. The problem is likely to get worse, with 1 in 3 households projected to be in fuel poverty by 2016.

2. The main reasons for this crisis are that gas, oil and coal prices are high, and the UK’s homes are some of the most energy inefficient in Europe – leaking heat from their doors, walls and windows.

3. Cold homes are damaging the health of vulnerable members of society, including children, older people and people with disabilities. Diseases such as asthma are made worse, and people are more likely to have strokes and heart attacks. Illnesses caused by cold homes cost the NHS nearly one billion pounds each year.

4. Over the next 15 years the Government will raise an average of £4 billion every year in carbon taxes through the European Emissions Trading Scheme and the Carbon Floor Price. Recycling this revenue back into households could bring 9 out of 10 homes out of fuel poverty, lower people’s bills, cut carbon emissions and create jobs.

The Council therefore resolves to:

1.  Support the Energy Bill Revolution campaign calling for the Government to recycle revenues from carbon taxes into improving the energy efficiency of UK homes.

2. Notify local Members of Parliament of its support for the campaign and urge them to support the campaign by emailing 
MPsupporters@energybillrevolution.org.

Saturday, 5 October 2013

My contribution to #CoopParty Debate on Economy policy paper


The Co-operative Party has changed how it runs it conference this year. Instead of deabating motions - some often mutually exclusive - that go nowhere, this year the format is to debate 6 policy papers that have been produced by the NEC. 

Local branches have had chance to contribute to in the drafting process and some of these submissions. Missing policy ideas are able to be added.

The first policy area to be debated was The Economy based on this policy paper

Debate 1. Economy (60 mins)
There were twenty three separate party submissions on the Economy. Twenty one of the submissions were either included or related to other policy papers. 

Two policy ideas have been recommended to the CAC for debate and vote (see below).

1. An incoming Labour and Co-operative government will appoint a government Minister with a specific remit for working with co-operatives and third sector social enterprises in order to help improve their sustainability. 
Yorkshire and Humberside Party
NEC Recommendation: FOR VOTE

2. Fighting the recession and unemployment.The Party should campaign as one of its major priorities, for the introduction of the Living Wage as the best solution to the low wage and benefits income strategy. Also, short term and zero hours contracts in the job market should be phased out.
South West Party
NEC Recommendation: NEC asks to include a vote on the minimum wage being raised to a living wage.This would remove the competitive disadvantage to co-operatives of paying the living wage where their rivals do not.


As part of the discussion on the policy saver. I had this to say in support of the SW Party Council policy idea on the Living Wage 

Paul Bull
Labour and Co-operative Councillor on Exeter City Council
and South West Party delegate

I am proud to say that 30 employees of Exeter City Council will find an extra special Christmas bonus in their December 2013 pay packet

From that date, each and every employee working for Exeter City Council - not of one whom has a zero-hours contract - will receive the Living Wage.

We do this not because we have to - but because we want to.

The Living Wage is a bench mark of good practice and we hope that many businesses in Exeter and beyond will follow our lead.

I would like to see any company that pays a dividend to shareholders being forced to pay the Living Wage

But I am concerned by the NEC recommendation - that the statutory National Minimum Wage should be raised to the Living Wage.

I cannot find fault with the ideal and aspiration - it's the wording of the recommendation gives me a problem.

I work in theatre -
co-operative working models and methods abound

But low pay is endemic and many emerging companies struggle now to pay the minimum wage

To raise this overnight to the level of the Living Wage would remove for opportunities theatre practitioners

I would like see the National Minimum Wage raised year on year to converge towards  he level of verbs Living Wage.

It is only with this proviso can I ask you to support the NEC recommendation

Thursday, 12 September 2013

E&E | Our 20mph zones 'are not enforced'

 





Thursday, September 12, 2013
   
FRESH calls have been made to enforce 20mph zones in Exeter.

A number of residential areas across the city have the speeding restriction but there is concern that they are not being enforced.

The county council is currently carrying out a 'review' of the zones to make sure they are compliant with the law and are clear to motorists.

And the authority claims the police have powers to act to catch speeding motorists in 20mph zones.
But councillors have called for more to be done and questioned why they haven't been enforced.

Councillor Paul Bull, who represents Cowick, said: "20mph zones have been in place in Cowick since 2000, but at no time in those 13 years have they been legally enforceable – even when the Government relaxed regulations making it easier to set-up 20mph zones, as Devon County Council haven't made them valid."

A Devon County Council spokesman said action could be taken to prevent speeding.

He said: "We are aware of the concerns over speeding in 20mph zones and limits and we are taking the opportunity to review them. Our review is ensuring 20mph limits are as visible as possible and provide adequate information to motorists. The police have a number of tools available to them to ensure motorists respect the speed limits and drive accordingly."

Police have said they will enforce speed limits if they are made aware of particular problem areas.
A spokesman said: "If action to curtail speed is to be considered within 20mph limits, a number of options can be considered.
"This may include high visibility patrols in the locality, speed limit indicator devices flashing the limit to traffic, letter drops in the area and Community Speed Watch.

"Enforcement through prosecution is a final resort and where evidence is available of wilful violations by specific offenders at known times of the day, enforcement action should be targeted at those identified times and offending motorists."

Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Is Cowick's "Broadway" 20 mph zone now enforceable?

Earlier this week, I was informed by Devon County Council Highways officers that works specified by them following an audit process in the Broadway 20 mph zone have been completed.

They say that they have yet to check this on the ground before final sign off.

Just to see what they have done, I spent 30 minutes on Sunday pacing out the physical calming measures, 20 mph repeater roundels and 20 mph carriageway roundels to see if I think they meet the necessary regulations to enable Devon & Cornwall to enforce the 20 mph speed limit.



To be compliant there must be at least one physical traffic calming measure - speed hump, speed table, chicane, bend over more than 70 degrees , etc as outlined under Direction 16 of TSRGB 2002 [see previous blogs!] AND no point of the zone can be more than 50m from
(1) a physical traffic calming measure set under that same Direction 16; or
(2) 20 mph repeater roundel; or
(3) 20mph carriageway roundel 

Here's what I found:


Broadway
Gateway to speed table just before LP 2 = 68
To speed table  just before PL 4 = 100
To speed table just before LP = 153
This more than exceeds the maximum of 100m between any 2 measures under direction 16
To LH bend = 76.
Bend to flats = 77
Possibly 20mph repeater outside 108 not needed here, and could be placed elsewhere as it is within 50m of other measures
To repeater outside 124 = 89
To Cowick Hill = 33

Greenway
To LH bend = 54
To right angled flats = 102
As the bend is probably NOT 70 degrees in 32m inner radius, I would question the valisity here

Littleway
All valid

Vuefield Hill
To LH bend = 69
To garage outside 23 = 75
Both these stretches are probably non-compliant

Cowick Hill
From Stanway cul-de-sac to roundel outside 127 = 92
Cause for concern
To Broadway Hill = 50
To roundel outside 107 = 60
If a junction is not classied as a bend of not less than 70 degrees, this stretch would not be valid
To table = 44
To roundel on LP 6 = 124
This more than exceeds the maximum of 100m between any 2 measures under direction 16
To table = 72 outside 49
to LH bend = 32
To table = 41
To parkway = 18
To table = ??
 
Parkway
To hump = 48
To roundel outside 29 = 77
To hump outside 50 = 99
To roundel outside 68 = 85
To end of CDS = 66 but close to 90 degree bend on BW
 
Orchard Hill
From Cowick Hill to roundel  = 44
from Parkway to roundel = 51

From my paced measurements I see at least 5 stretches that probably do not meet direction 16.

I wonder if DCC's Highways officers is agree?

Thursday, 5 September 2013

Can the 20 mph speed limit be enforced in Cowick?


As you are aware from previous blogs, even before joining Exeter HATOC I have taken a very proactive role in promoting 20 mph zones withon Cowick and Exeter.
 
I raised the matter at the Exeter meeting on 19 April 2012.
 
During my presentation to that meeting,I was trying to oultine my understanding for the regulations surrounding 20 mph zones I was stopped by the chair at the time, Cllr Andrew Leadbetter, who said that my understanding of the regulations had been superceded by new guidance that had been previously covered by the committee.
 
My subsequent research led me to that new guidance contained within the Road traffic Regulation Act 1984 - Sections 64 and 65 Special Directions signed on authority of the Secretary of State by a Delegated Official in the DfT on 17 October 2011 [GT50/035/0024].
 
 
As a resut of this research I asked under Standing Order 23 (2) the matter to be discussed at the Exeter HATOC meeting held on 18 April 2013.
 
I was very sorry to miss this discussion due to unavoidable work commitments, but was gladden by minute 179 Review of 20 mph Limits and Zones in Exeter, and in particular the resolution:
It wss MOVED by Cllr Leadbetter, SECONDED by Cllr Westlake and
RESOLVED that the action to ensure that 20 mph Limits and Zones within Exeter were compliant with current Department for Transport signing standards be supported.
 
At the subsequent meeting, held on 23 July 2013, although unminuted, it was confirmed that the audit of 20 mph zones had been completed and it was agreeed that local ward councillors - both County and City - would be informed on what was needed to make zones within their wards compliant.
 
Having not heard anything on this matter by 19 August 2013, i asked to be given a status report.
 
I was informed in an e-mail by Adrian Jelfs [Assistant Senior Traffic Engineer] that only 2 roads in Cowick needed attention to bring both 20mph zones in Cowick into compliance - Broadway and Bowhay Lane 
 

I raised some issues with some other roads mentioned in that e-mail which were not actually in my ward.

 
On 03 September, I recieved notification form Adrian Jelfs that the contractor had now completed the requisite works and an e-mail exchange ensued to confirm that the level of signing in all areas of Cowick [including Bowhay Lane and Barley Lane] will be in accordance with the regulations and it is anticipated that all of Exeter’s 20 mph zones and limits will be “signed off” for enforcement around the end of November
 
To me this means , as well as at least one traffic calming measure as defined in Drection 16 (2) of 2002 TSRGD, that also no part of the 20mph zone bounded by Barley Lane- Nadder Park Road / Isleworth Road / Buddle Lane / Dunsford Road is NO MORE than 50m from:
a traffic calming feature as defined in Direction 16 (2) of the 2002 TSRGD; OR
a sign shown in diagram 670 in schedule 2 of the 2002 TRSGD [namesly a 20mph repeater roundel]; OR
a sign shown in diagram 1065, when varied to "20", in the 2002 TSRGD [namely a 20mph carriageway roundel]

 To put this in practice, I would believe that there should should never be more than 100m between any of the 3 measures 
 
My understanding is that unless ALL these conditions are in place, the zone is NOT valid and compliant and so is unenforceable by the police. So even if the stretch of, say Bowhay Lane is correctly signed or calmed, if somewhere esle in the overall zone isn't correctly signed or calmed, then the police cannot enforce the speed limit in Bowhay Lane
 
As I was not convinced that all these provisions were in place, today I undertook a ward walk that told about 90 minutes
 

My observations were that several roads are NOT correctly signed or calmed.

Nadder Park Road
From top of cul-sac to first repeater roundel = 196 paces
From 1st roundel to 2nd roundel = 235 paces
I believe at least another 5 repaeater roundels or carriageway roundels need to be added
 
Barley Lane
From 2nd roundel on Nadder Park Road to junction with Barley Farm Road = 37 paces
The 20mph reapeater roundel on bus stop on Barley Farm Road means that this small stretch is compliant
From Barley Farm Road to telepgraph pole = 132 paces
NB there is only a repeater roundel on the Sylvan Heights bound side, should one be placed on lamp-post 14 on the other side of the road 
Perhaps carriageway roundels  should be painted by the SLOW carriageway sign?
From telegraph pole to Croft Chase = 37 paces
The 20mph repeater roundel near the top of the rise menas that this small stretch is compliant
From Croft Chase to lamp-postlamppost outside 58 Barley Lane = 37paces
From lamp-post outsie 58 Barley Lane to lamp-post 10 on other side of road = 77 paces
Lamp-post 10 to lamp-post 7 opposite bus stop = 118 paces
This makes it close to 200m between repeater roundels and on this fact alone means the whole zone cannot be enforced
My suggestion would be to paint carriageway roundels either side of the Balrley Lane School zig-zags
From lamp-post 7 to speed table outside Sylvan Heights = 24 paces
To first speed hump = 45 paces
To second bump = 63 paces
To gateway = 60 paces
This bottom stretch is compliant 
 
Barley Farm RoadOther than a 20mph repeater roundel on the bus stop near Barley Lane the whole of Barley Lane is deficient in the necessary measures.

This means many points ar more than 50m from a necessary measure

Berkshire DriveNone of the necessary measure
This means many points ar more than 50m from a necessary measure
 
Wentworth GardenNo measures
50 pacess from Bowhay Lane to 83 Wentworth gardens
+50 paces from 83  Wentworth Gardensto rear of Dorset Avenue properties

This means many points ar more than 50m from a necessary measure

 
Myrtle RoadThere is 1 physical traffic calming measure but then
100 paces to top
Then 80 long top
the. 80 down to Oak Road

This means many points ar more than 50m from a necessary measure
 
I am concerned that with my observations made today that zones within Cowick are, despite assurances from Devon County Officers, are still not compliant.
 
And with that I question the accuracy of the audit and review process throughout the other 17 wards covering the city.
 
I had asked Devon County Council for sight of the audit/review survey carried out in Cowick?
 
In addtion, there appears to be no new interventions along Bowhay Lane and so I have asked for confimation on what the contractors were required to do here to bring this street up to compliance standard?
 
Not having visited the Braodway, Cowick Hill 20mph zone I have no comments yet on whether I beleive this zone had been made enforceable.